What Miyazaki’s New Film May Be Trying To Say About Japan Today

Earlier in December, I was extremely lucky and had the chance to go to an early screening of Studio Ghibli’s The Wind Rises (Kaze Tachinu). By this time, I’m sure many of us are aware that this is Hayao Miyazaki’s last film, as he declared in his retirement interview, though he has since kinda sorta come out of retirement (again).

I’m well aware of the amount of story summaries, spoilers, and background informations out there about The Wind Rises, so I wanted to discuss something a bit more different.

A lot has occurred during the last few years in Japan, with the most notable and society-changing incident that took place obviously being the Tohoku earthquake and tsunamis that wrecked Japan in March of 2011. Two (now almost three) years later, Japan is still dealing with the aftermath of this natural disaster— not only is Japan still rebuilding from the devastations of the quake, but the nuclear meltdown in Fukushima continues to worry the livelihood of the Japanese people. In addition to the natural disaster, the Japanese government under Prime Minister Abe is striving to pull Japan back up economically. Of course, the Abe regime’s actions and efforts aren’t without criticisms, as it is frequently condemned among the Japanese public.

In short, Japan is going through some tough, stormy times.

tohoku

Ghibli’s Kaze Tachinu might be a historical fiction based on a designer of the fighter plane Mitsubishi A6M Zero— but as I watched the film, I couldn’t help but compare the Japanese society of today to that of the one illustrated on screen in front of me. Perhaps it’s the tumultuous times that Japan faced in the last few years that overlaps with the turbulence of Japan before it launched into WWII, but the events and scenes within the film forced me to compare the current Japanese society with the one that Jiro Horikoshi (the main character) lived in during a pre-WWII era.

So I came across this question and wanted to discuss it a little further after watching Miyazaki’s final masterpiece—what did Miyazaki want to say about the Japanese society today through this film? Hopefully I’ll be able to give a different perspective of this film without giving away the plot!

To Be “Japanese”

One thing that’s particularly interesting about this film is that it’s based on an actual historical figure, Jiro Horikoshi, who designed the infamous Zero fighter planes.

Throughout the film, Jiro meets people of different countries— the famed aircraft engineer and designer Caproni of Italy, the European engineers he meets during his travel to a German aircraft manufacturers, to name a few. I think this movie might be the first time Miyazaki illustrated interaction of characters of different nationalities so clearly to the audience— and perhaps intentionally to make the audience (in this case the Japanese ones) think of what it means to be Japanese.

jiro

Historically speaking, Japan appears to have always played the role of “catching up” to the West— for the longest time, Japan’s goal has been to modernize to join the ranks of US and the European states, and maybe even surpass them. Miyazaki’s film touches upon this notion in the film through Jiro’s interaction with the engineers of a leading German aircraft manufacturer.

But the highlight here isn’t that Japan lagged behind technologically in terms of aircraft manufacturing— it’s how Jiro interacts with his German counterparts. Jiro’s a collected individual, and seeing the way he interacts and negotiates to achieve an “equal playing field” with the German workers might have been Miyazaki’s desire to remind his Japanese audience to be proud of who they are. It’s not exactly imbuing them with nationalism persay, but perhaps Miyazaki wanted to remind his Japanese viewers that despite certain disadvantages to other states, their country holds a lot of good qualities as well, many of which are portrayed through Jiro’s personality and nature.

Slowing Down

There’s quite a lot of comparison between the “old” and the “new” in the film, during which Jiro was at the forefront of modernizing and making the “new” generation of Japanese airplanes. Jiro might have been placed in charge of designing a new, fast and durable fighter plane in the film— but throughout the film, he drops hints of his appreciation for slowness.

slowingdownJiro’s plane is lugged onto the testing field “old school” fashion— using oxen.

“Is “fast”, “modernity” and “convenience” the be-all and end-all?” I felt like Miyazaki was constantly throwing this question at me during the film. It’s an appropriate question for the Japanese society today, especially in the light of recent Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011. Sure, nuclear energy is convenient for a country like Japan that lacks energy resources— does it mean it should put its dependency and priority on it? This might just be one example, but I felt that Miyazaki was beckoning his audience to question this dependency on modernity, and instead consider the alternatives and remember how things were done in the past. There’s not only one way to do things— and perhaps Miyazaki wants his audience to recognize the implications of such conventional methods on the society today.

All You Need Is Love

pdaJiro and Nahoko share a kiss sporadically throughout the film.

My god, the PDA in this film.

I’m sure many of you are aware that this movie, aside from being about the aspirations of a budding aircraft engineer, also has romance. In the film, Jiro meets and falls in love with a beautiful yet ill-fated girl Nahoko. Despite her illness, the two lovers seek to cherish each other, treasuring every moment that they get to share together.

Miyazaki films aren’t known for overt displays of affection— if I think back, the first time I recognized obvious kissing being part of the film was in Howl’s Moving Castle, when Sophie kisses Howl and in Ponyo on the Cliff By the Sea, when Ponyo also kissed (more like pecked) Sosuke at the end of the film.

Regardless, The Wind Rises goes past the light pecks and kisses and really goes above and beyond to show Jiro and Nahoko’s love for one another— and if the film insisted on such blatant forms of PDA all throughout the movie, I knew it meant something significant.

Despite the volatility in their era, Jiro and Nahoko stuck to one another and supported each other— Miyazaki might have wanted to relay the same lesson to the Japanese society today, which also faces equally disturbing political and socioeconomic issues. As a country still rebuilding from a massive earthquake, there’s a lot that needs to be taken care of in Japan— perhaps through his film, Miyazaki is urging the Japanese to support one another, to cherish your loved ones, and to have each other’s backs in this time of struggle. The Japanese society is still in for a wild-ride, and the people can’t possibly stand it without the help of others. As simple as it might sound, helping other people- and being helped by them- can’t be any more relevant to the Japanese society than today.

All you need is love— and everything will fall in place. I felt like that message sat well in me at the end of this beautiful movie.

So, when this film comes to a theater (or download) near you, be sure to watch out for some of these things. What does this historical film say about society today? Certainly something, anyways. If you’ve seen the film let me know what you thought too (without giving away spoilers!)

Seen the movie already too? Think differently about what Miyazaki wanted to relay in his final work? Post on the comment below!

  • tassenish

    When i watch a Ghibli movie for the first time I don’t think about stuff like this, but I always watch films several times. The more I watch a film, there more i think about stuff like this. I really want to see this film as soon as possible, but I live in norway, so it’s most likely a long time before i can watch it ( at least in the cinemas).

  • Shoko

    Thanks for your comment! For some Ghibli films I definitely need to watch it more than once to start seeing some of the commentaries it’s making. I remember the first time I saw Spirited Away I was in middle school so it was just “oh cool, all the spirits. Look at that cool dragon boy!” Same with Howl’s Moving Castle. Maybe it’s because I’m much older now that these things came to me as soon as I saw the movie.

    Norway! Wow, glad we have Ghibli fans all over the world! I hope you can get your hands on this movie soon!

  • 古戸ヱリカ

    Incidentally, I have also designed zero fighter planes.

  • Rebane

    I also think Kaze Tachinu is a movie about today’s Japan and love. I watched the movie twice at the nearby theater.

  • collins gustilo

    I would love to see this movie. Howl’s is still my running favorite. I’m a hopeless romantic and I’m sure I’ll indulge on this. But I live in UAE now and that means, I could only watch in online when it goes viral. Which in legal years, is never. =D

  • Shoko

    Thanks for your comment! I also agree. It might be a comparison to how Japanese society treats/sees relationships (romantic ones especially) today, maybe even criticizing it.

  • tassenish

    I am in the middle school now XD

  • Rob

    If you haven’t seen it you may find Film Critic Hulk’s essay on it interesting. It does give away the plot for those you haven’t seen the film.

    http://badassdigest.com/2013/12/09/the-wind-rises-and-cinematic-moralism/

    Don’t be put off by the name and all capital letters it’s some of the most insightful film writing around.

  • Mel Dennison

    I agree with Tassenish, I would consider Howl’s to be one of my all time favorite movies, ever! Spirited Away introduced me to the entirely new world of anime for me and I’ve never looked back. When it comes to a Ghibli movie I watch it the first time to get lost in the beautiful art and spectacular story, then I watch it a few more times to contemplate what is being said. I can watch a Ghibli movie over and over, and it’s always different each time. I love trying to decipher the meanings as well, coming from an entirely different cultural background it makes it wonderf

  • xperroni

    Dear Shoko,

    Since you mentioned nuclear energy as one of the topics you thought the movie might invite viewers to think about, and since there seems to be a dearth on information about this topic in the mainstream channels, I would like to share some facts that might enlighten this particular discussion, whenever and wherever it might take place.

    Nuclear power is hands-down the most efficient, clean energy source we have mastered so far. 1Kg of uranium packs as much energy as 1.652 tons of gasoline [1] – all without throwing a single gram of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Since nuclear “waste” is solid and fairly limited in volume, it can be collected and stored safe in the nuclear plant itself – or better yet, recycled for successive runs through the reactor, until all radioactive material is consumed. [2]

    Much is made of accidents such as the one that happened in Fukushima. What is not as often publicized, is that for all the power the nuclear industry produces, its security record is nothing short of stellar. Of the three worst “nuclear accidents” of history (Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile Island), the last two have not claimed a single soul as far as nuclear power is concerned [3] – and in the case of Three Mile Island, not a single soul, period [4]. Now how many people did die in, say, the third worst oxen car accident of all time? I bet it was more than zero.

    The question of long-term effects of irradiation is often exaggerated. Late 2011 studies of Fukushima [5] show the region around the plant to be less radioactive than the beaches of Guarapari in Brazil [6] – where incidentally my family would go for summer vacations when I was a child. So either there is a rampaging cancer epidemic going on in Guarapari that nobody knows about, or perhaps, as Dr. Sakamoto Kiyohiko’s research [7] suggests, at low levels the correlation between radiation and health issues is not as direct as some would make out to be.

    Should Japan move away from nuclear power, where would it get its energy from? We can take a look at what’s happening in Germany, whose initiative to turn off nuclear plants has led it to build fossil fuel plants like there’s no tomorrow [8]. Wind and solar plants are hardly an option, as they need some sort of back-up readily available to take up from where they let us down (in a cloudy or windless day) – and that “some sort” currently are fossil fuel plants. More fuel plants equal more cases of breathing diseases and aggravated commercial balance deficit [9], not to mention accelerated climate change. Hardly a good idea, ditching nuclear, then.

    Nuclear energy is not just “convenient”, and not just for Japan either. It’s our best bet to get through the century without suffocating in soot and carbon dioxide, or dooming large parts of the world population to hunger and poverty. It’s no wonder that China, which already has to deal with runaway energy demands and increasing environmental issues, has embarked in an ambitious project to more than double its current nuclear power capacity in the next years [10].

    [1] http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1162:_Log_Scale
    [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fuel_cycle#Reprocessing
    [3] http://www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/pressrels/2012/unisous144.html “A key point among the interim findings is that although several workers were irradiated after contamination of their skin, no clinically observable effects have been reported. Six workers have died since the accident but none of the deaths were linked to irradiation, the findings say.”
    [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident_health_effects
    [5] http://ramap.jaea.go.jp/map/?
    [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guarapari#History
    [7] http://atomicinsights.com/dr-kiyohiko-sakamoto-low-dose-radiation-used-as-cancer-treatment/
    [8] http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304259304576375154034042070
    [9] http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6aa68b02-65d6-11e2-a17b-00144feab49a.html#axzz2QX22fTK4
    [10] http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Country-Profiles/Countries-A-F/China–Nuclear-Power/

  • https://twitter.com/RochelleBreen Rochelle

    I thought of these facts, too, xperroni. Many Japanese citizens were actively protesting against nuclear energy after the Fukushima accident. So I was glad that Shoko focused things on the movie, just on how one of Japan’s most beloved artists might be inviting questions about the complex ways our lives involve technology.

  • https://twitter.com/RochelleBreen Rochelle

    Great post, Shoko! I got goosebumps right around “The Japanese society is still in for a wild-ride, and the people can’t possibly stand it without the help of others”. I might not have wanted to watch this movie knowing it’s about a Japanese WWII engineer, but now I’ll try to see it!

  • Shoko

    Thanks Rochelle! I know there’s a lot of controversy over why/if Miyazaki should have made a movie about a WWII engineer, but I can definitely assure you this movie is a lot more than about WWII and making planes. I’m certainly no engineer myself (go humanities), but I think the movie really reflects Horikoshi’s life.

    I read somewhere that the REAL Jiro Horikoshi (the actual dude) once murmured “I just wanted to make beautiful planes.” That made me think about the engineers that wanted to invent beautiful pieces of work, and the political and social turmoil that brought it to use as scary war planes.

  • Shoko

    Thanks so much for your detailed comment! I really appreciate it. While I personally believe in shifting away from nuclear energy, I can see why it’s an effective alternative source of energy. And it’s certainly not something we can immediately cut ourselves off of.

    However I can’t help but think that there’s something about nuclear resource and Japan that just doesn’t… mix, if that makes sense. Certainly it may be due to my upbringing, but I think the movie does help in questioning the audience (both Japanese and non-Japanese) about the ways we’ve been using technology and science for our conveniences. We’re only human and trying to control these sometimes dangerous resources comes at a degree of danger.

    I’m not saying we should cut ourselves off from nuclear energy completely– that carries a lot of implications in itself too. But it’s something we need to reconsider, in my opinion.

  • xperroni

    We’re only human and trying to control these sometimes dangerous resources comes at a degree of danger.

    The world is always dangerous. We are always surrounded by dangerous forces. If you run into an animal that doesn’t like you (like a wolf, or a boar, or a rabid dog) it will attack and maybe kill you. If you’re out in a cold night without shelter or heating, you’ll freeze to death. If you don’t have food you’ll starve.

    But the thing is, if we play it right, we can set up those forces to our favor and come out on top. And so it is that our earliest ancestors found that with fire, they could scare alway dangerous animals, stay warm in the cold, and cook food that would otherwise be inedible.

    About 2,500 people die every year in fire-related accidents, and that just in the US. [1] Even the most sensationalist and discredited post-Fukushima reports [2] project death tolls just about approaching this number, but on a scale of many years – and more reasonable accounts, such as the one given by the IAEA, don’t expect significant consequences to public health. Given these numbers, what is the most immediate danger: nuclear power or fire? Should we then reconsider, and maybe shift away from fire?

    Of course not. Compared to the dangers it keeps at bay, fire is far and away the best bet. Sometimes it’s mishandled and people die as a result, but this doesn’t cancel out the many lives it saves. But if after the first time a fire broke out and people died in it, humans had decided this mysterious force was too dangerous and abandoned it – what would have become of us?

    Indeed we are human, and as humans we have this wonderful ability to study, understand and eventually make use of nature. This is our birthright: it’s how we lived our lives ever since we first split stones to make tools, skinned animals to make clothes, grew crops in fields or domesticated cattle. Like the Force, it’s not without its perils – people can lust over and overuse it, or wield it in anger, to great damage – but forsaking it is just as bad. We are heirs to the stars – do not deny our place among the stars because you are afraid.

    [1] http://www.usfa.fema.gov/statistics/estimates/index.shtm
    [2] http://www.marklynas.org/2012/07/fukushima-death-tolls-junk-science/