The Basics of Career Life In Japan

Last week I talked briefly about 過労死 (かろうし, karoshi) and the effects it has on the Japanese society. Branching off of the article and continuing the Japanese business series of articles, we’ll take a succinct look into the institution that fosters the karoshi problem and also helped fueled Japan towards becoming a global economic identity: the Japanese career system.

Structure of the Japanese career system

In the United States, your career growth is primarily dependent on a few assets, but two of them are arguably the most important: the degree of specialization of your skills set and your performance. Typically, you develop yourself in a single market, moving from job to job, to develop specialized skills in order to move up the ladder and/or fatten up the paycheck. Your pay increases as you develop a highly specialized skill set, but eventually tapers off when you hit the limit of your progression. Your employment remains secure as long as you are productive. You have the option to jump from company to company, job to job, and obtain a position you are qualified for.

On average, an American goes through 5-8 different jobs and 3-4 different occupations in their lifetime. In other words, we are nomadic when it comes to who we work for; Short-term workers in a sense.

The United States style of career progression heavily contrasts that of Japan’s.

There are a few concepts that distinguish the Japanese from the United States style of white collar career growth

  1. 終身雇用 (しゅうしんこよう; shuushinkoyou). Life time employment. A hired professional under the 終身雇用制度 (しゅうしんこようせいど; shushinkoyouseido; lifetime employment system).
  2. 年功序列 (ねんこうじょれつ; nenkoujyoretsu). Seniority by length of service. Salary is dependent on individual’s status under the 年功序列制度 (ねんこうじょれつせいど; nenkoujyoretsuseido; seniority system).
  3. 人事異動 (じんじいどう; jinjiidou). Constant job position changes within the company, not necessarily tailored to one’s skill set.

Once out of school and hired on, the expectations are for the employee to commit themselves to the company until retirement. One life, one employer.

Requirements for getting hired by a firm are usually an excellent set of general skills, and an attendance at a reputable university under your belt (for example: University of Tokyo, Keio University, Kyoto University, etc.). No skill specialization is required early on because the company will ensure you get the training you need throughout your career. The trade-off for this is a low entry-level salary.

The loss of salary during the entry-level phase is made up later in the career. Unlike the U.S. system where salary is based on performance and specialization, the Japanese salary is increased by length of service. Late in their careers, the growth percentage of a Japanese salary tends to be greater than the U.S. counterpart. Additional benefits are also given based on length of service. For example, after reaching a certain seniority level, the employee may be offered free company paid housing near the office.

The importance of the general skill set is emphasize throughout the career of the Japanese employee. Human resources will assign the individual positions in various departments, and a lot of times the position given will in no way match their education or current skill set. In the end, the employee will be able to play out many hats and understand the company as a whole. This is great for shaping employees into managerial roles.

Promotion to a higher status position is based on length of service. Job performance and skill set are secondary when it comes to promotion time for the employee. Higher level positions tend to be filled from within. Thus, it is not easy to leave a company for another because doing so essentially resets your “seniority counter”, which will stall your career growth and salary.

While it is great that experience is valued, the downfall of the seniority system is that upper level positions are filled with aged workers (the old guard), regardless of their productivity levels and qualifications. How the system is set up, firing low productivity workers is difficult. This puts younger, more capable employees at a disadvantage, since they have to wait in line behind everyone else in order to be promoted to a higher status position. In addition, having all been trained under the same system, the culture doesn’t lend itself for “radical” or “outside” ideas.

On the upside, the Japanese career structure builds a strong loyalty culture amongst the company. Having everyone commit to one company in their careers and without the fear of being laid off, people tend to trust each other more. It is like being a part of a second (or third) family.

P.S. Are you a hip, new lackey in the Japanese corporate cog? Share it on Twitter.
P.P.S. Perhaps you are part of the old boy’s club? Let us know on Facebook or Google+.

  • José

    This was probably one of the most informative japan related blog entries I’ve ever read, apart from those talking about japanese learning, of course.

  • AbelSayuri

    I can see why stress and frustration can be associated to the salaryman. Perhaps a melding of the two structures could yield stronger companies where your skill, productivity and longevity are factored into your salary as well as company loyalty.

    I say this but I don’t see it happening in either country any time soon. YOUTH REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!

  • ZXNova

    One life, One Job. Wow, that’s so much more easier than moving from job to job. Well maybe the seniority system isn’t so bad, cause the more “wiser”. Although the younger people are more capable, it’s better to have more wiser people in the higher positions because they’ve been there longer and know what’s going on more and can teach the newer younger people what’s to know of the company, especially since this is ONE LIFE ONE JOB after all. Almost like you have many father figures teaching you whatever.

  • Lance

    What about Trade type jobs like a construction worker or a mechanic do they have the same sort of system?

  • http://twitter.com/kur1 Christopher Bral

    This is largely what causes Japanese red tape and stagnation. Imagine someone joining a company under idea X. They continue working under the philosophy of idea X until they retire. Within the same company.

    Add to that the deferment to your seniors and it can create a very slow-moving and group-thinkish workplace. When it works, it creates a well-oiled machine. But when it fails (see Olympus & other corrupt businesses, slow-to-react companies) it fails miserably.

    This puts a lot of dependence on a strong, visionary set of executives and senior managers. But since productivity and experience take a backseat to seniority, you can see why you’re playing Russian Roulette with your company.

  • http://www.vietamins.com Viet

    Very true. Another contributor to the slow pace is group consensus. Nothing moves forward unless there is 100% acceptance. If there is at least one individual not convinced about an idea, a good amount of time is spent on discussion, etc. This is great in the sense that every decision is well thought out, but a lot of decisions being made don’t require that much TLC.

  • Empathyart

    These articles are great. I am in the middle of applying and transferring to Apple Japan. This gives me great insight into the mentality of the Japan workforce.

  • Kiriain

    Occupy Shibuya?

  • Snuitkever

    Because of an internship in japan, I`m very interested in this series of articles about Japanese business. I hope you re willing to write more. One subject that I especially would like to know more about is foreign people at japanese companies. Are there big differences between companies on this aspect?

  • http://www.facebook.com/perry.brown1 Perry Brown

    Yeah, I’d also love to know whether foreign employees are treated any differently to what’s been described here.

  • Jon E.

    I’d like to know this too

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nat-Wel/1477579975 Nat Wel

    Why do people always Compare Japan to America when describing Caucasion Countries, and never European and Soviet Countries, are we expected to be exactly the same as Americans just because we aren’t yellow skinned with slanty eyes? FYI i’ve never been to America.