47 Ronin Review – How Does It Stack Up?

A while back I wrote a post about Keanu Reeves and the new 47 Ronin movie he was in. Over Christmas break I saw this movie, filled with high hopes but very low expectations. It had some of my favorite actors, and the Japanese story the film is based on is one of my favorites. But how does it stack up? Does the movie do the story of the 47 Ronin justice?

Brief Plot Recap

ronin-posters**I’ll try to keep this as spoiler free as possible, but I’m going to assume that you’ve at least read my previous post on the movie or are familiar with the story of the 47 Ronin. If you haven’t seen the film and don’t want to have anything potentially be ruined, read on with care**

So the three main characters of the film are played by some entertaining actors. The main bad guy, Kira, is played by Tadonobu Asano and the main good guy, Oishi, is played by Hiroyuki Sanada. These are two of my all time favorite Japanese actors (which I wrote about a little while ago) so it was really cool to see them in the same film.

ronin-cast

But, of course, the main star is a Hollywood star, Keanu Reeves. Keanu plays the character known as Kai, the “half breed” who ends up being the hero of the story, and also the one that gets the girl (of course).

For those unfamiliar, the basic story behind the 47 Ronin tells of a group of 47 masterless samurai in 18th century Japan who avenge the death of their master. Their master was disgraced, and their land and honor taken from them. They follow the code of the bushido to avenge their master’s death and as a consequence, all of them die. It is one of Japan’s greatest tales.

In the original tale, Oishi leads the ronin in their revenge, but in this Hollywood adaptation, he more or less shares that responsibility with Keanu Reeve’s character Kai, who in turn takes most of the limelight. The movie also introduces exciting supernatural fantasy elements, such as demons.

A Review

47-ronin-two

“Do people like our movie?” “No… no they don’t.”

Like I said before, I went into the film with high hopes and low expectations. My expectations were not exceeded. My favorite parts about the movie were probably all the neat colors and interesting costumes. The movie itself just wasn’t that exciting.

I was really disappointed because the actual tale of the 47 Ronin is just so darn cool. I was hoping that with an all-star cast and the introduction of cool fantasy elements, they’d really be able to make a great movie adaptation here. Unfortunately they did not.

Critics really dislike the film and the general consensus is that they were just disappointed, especially given the names and talent involved. Tadanobu Asano and Hiroyuki Sanada are both great actors. People have mixed feelings about Keanu, but I’ve always liked the guy. Unfortunately the scripting for 47 Ronin left them all with unexciting, relatively one dimensional roles to play.

The film was also widely reported as a financial failure with estimated losses hovering around the $175 million mark. That’s like, really, really bad.

Here are some Rotten Tomato quotes I think best sum up the reception of the movie.

Solemn as a funeral march, humorless as your junior high principal, as Japanese as a grocery-store California roll, Keanu Reeves’s let’s-mope-about-and-kill-ourselves samurai drama has exactly three things going for it.
-Alan Scherstuhl, Village Voice

With a better hand this could have been something glorious and grand. As it is, 47 Ronin is solid B-movie entertainment with a $175 million budget.
-Kristy Puchko, CinemaBlend.com

47 Ronin is murky, muddled and leaden, although it’s not quite the unmitigated disaster it’s been cracked up to be.
-Xan Brooks, Observer [UK]

Mildly entertaining and gorgeous to look at, 47 Ronin has little beneath the surface to recommend it. There are a few good fights, though.
-Roth Cornet, IGN Movies

Japanese Demons in the Film

ronin-monstersOne of the most exciting potentials of this film was its inclusion of mythological creatures. I was curious how they would handle these in the film, and after viewing it, I think they did a relatively unimpressive job. We’ve written about Japanese creatures before, so I was interested in exploring how the portrayal of them in this film compared with what’s traditional.

Kitsune

kitsune-fox

See the resemblance?

The main creatures included in the film are a witch (possibly a kitsune) and some tengu. The witch lady is never called a kitsune (magical foxes that can take on human form), but it is first shown as a fox, so that was my first impression of it.

The kitsune witch has become Kira’s sidekick. Kitsune are commonly portrayed as lovers as well as tricksters, so this fits in with the movie’s portrayal. The witch is playing tricks on everyone to further her and Kira’s agenda. It’s unclear in the movie if they’re actually lovers, but at the very least, they are companions. Who’s really in control between the two of them is unclear.

While the witch in the film uses magic and kitsune are magical creatures, the witch’s magic seems a bit out of the realm of the traditional kitsune. The witch in the film also transforms into different forms and creatures, such as a dragon. This leads me to believe that she wasn’t actually a kitsune, or the directors just took some real liberties with how kitsune behave.

All in all, the transformations didn’t make a lot of sense (assuming she was a kitsune). That being said, what do you expect from Hollywood, after all?

Tengu

Kunitsuna-TenguKeanu Reeve’s character is raised by tengu in the film. Traditional tengu are incredibly popular supernatural creatures found in Japanese folklore, art, theater, and literature. They’re one of the best known mythological creatures in Japan and are sometimes even worshiped as Shinto kami. Tengu were originally thought to be birdlike, and they are traditionally depicted with both human and avian characteristics.

The earliest tengu were pictured with beaks, but this feature has since modernized into an unnaturally long nose, which is undoubtedly their defining characteristic today.

Buddhist dogma long held that the tengu were disruptive demons who brought both violence and death. However, their image gradually softened into protective, if still dangerous, spirits of the mountains and forests.

Their main role in the film is to provide weapons to the 47 ronin after Kai and Oishi prove themselves. The way the tengu look in the film is unlike any depiction I’d ever seen of them and I was confused as to why they would alter them in this way.

As you can see from the photo below, the tengu from the movie does not look like a traditional tengu. None of their typical features or characteristics are reflected in the film. Its face is totally different. Why would they alter its nose? The tengu’s most recognizable feature? Beats me.

47-Ronin-Tengu

Can you spot the differences?

Other than that, I felt like the film’s depiction of tengu was surprisingly accurate. Tengu have been described as creatures associated with war and were known to possess great knowledge in the art of skilled combat. Legend also tells of a famous warrior called Minamoto no Yoshitsune whose father was assassinated by the Taira clan. One day he encountered some mountain tengu and they taught him the art of swordsmanship to assist in his vengeance against the Taira.

This all fits in well with the tengu raising Kai and teaching him how to fight like a supernatural being. It also makes decent sense that they would be able to provide the ronin in the film with weapons after they passed a goofy test. Overall, I was pleased with the movie’s depiction of tengu. It’s what’s on the inside that counts, right?

All in All

ronin-keanu

“What’d you say about my movie?”

Throughout this review of The 47 Ronin, I think I’ve been pretty nice. I’d like to sum it up by saying that this movie is not worth your money. Since the best parts of the film (in my opinion) are the visuals, it would probably be best experienced on a cinema screen, but I don’t think it’s worth the admission.

I also think that the more you know about the original 47 Ronin story and the more you know about Japan and Japanese myth, the more you will enjoy this film. If you don’t know much about the original tale or are totally clueless concerning Japanese folklore/myth, some parts of the movie might be a bit confusing.

The movie is entertaining enough for one viewing, but really, it’s not a good film. If you don’t expect much, you’ll be able to enjoy it for what it is, even if it’s not much more than pretty colors and nifty visuals. The fight scenes ain’t too bad either.

Final Verdict: 4 Mr. Andersons

  • Tomek Donarski

    After seeing the trailer I decided to boycott that SFX massacre of Japanese culture. Why would one ruin such a nice story?
    @John I admire the fact that you were able to write an objective review of “that” ;]

  • Julia

    Kevin Kataoka perfectly expresses why I am frustrated with movies like this.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDLrMLFbl2U

  • DAVIDPD

    It was shit. Done.

  • Rebane

    I like your reference to the legend of Minamoto no Yoshitsune raised by Tengu in Kurama, Kyoto. But one should also be reminded that the Tengu of Kurama looks very different from the father and son tengu in Takao, Tokyo. The tengu chief depicted in the movie has a face pretty much like that of the son tengu, Karasu Tengu (literally: crow tengu), of Takao. There is a difference, though: Karasu Tengu has wings with which he can fly. One thing I miss in the article is a reference to the 1983 Kadokawa movie Legend of the Eight Samurai (Satomi Hakken-den), which featured the young Hiroyuki Sanada. He was in the role of a non-samurai young man who is a kind of ‘half-breed’, but joins the team of samurai and kills the witch who turns out to be his mother to save the princess (Hiroko Yakushimaru).

  • Bill O’Dwyer

    The historical consultant for this film was one of my teachers in first year: Dr. Stephen Turnbull of the University of Leeds. When we found out about his involvement in this movie, myself and a few others asked him how it was going. He said that it was fun meeting all the actors and watching the process of creating a film. On the other hand he said that as far as historical consultancy (and accuracy) goes, he felt like he was being humoured a lot of the time, and at worst outright ignored. Based on that fact alone, I’ll probably give it a miss…

  • キツネじゃない

    MORE SLANDEROUS LIES FROM HOLLYWOOD, I SEE. As always, don’t let movies like this prevent you from looking into any real Japanese history, real Japanese mythology, or leaving real delicious rice and fried tofu just outside your home in a easy to reach area away from any large dogs you may own.

  • AnimeFan

    Wait – since when has Japanese media dealt with foreign cultures with accuracy, respect and dignity? Anyone see Thermae Romae? Uh…was that movie accurate and respectful of foreign culture?

    Or how about Shingeki no Kyojin, “Attack on Titan”? That’s an anime that takes place in Europe, somewhere around Germany. Is anything about that an accurate, fair, realistic depiction of German cultures? Does anyone in Japan give two shits about whether or not their favorite anime is depicting foreign cultures fairly?

    Why do we act like Japan is some kind of oppressed minority that needs to be treated with kid gloves? Do you think they have even half the respect for our cultures that we have for theirs? Do you think they would hesitate for a moment to adopt/adapt/steal a foreign myth or legend and adapt it to their own whims?

    Go do a quick search through any anime catalogue and you’ll find the quick answer to your question: no fucking way. The Japanese LOVE treating foreign cultures as their little plaything, with absolutely zero respect whatsoever for the original source material. And, look, I’m saying this as a huge fan of anime – I LOVE anime, but let’s not bullshit around about how much “respect” Japanese artists have for foreign cultures. Hell, how much respect did Ghibli have for Earthsea, hm?

    Review this movie as an action film if you must, but keep your weeaboo fanboyism out of it. Who gives a shit if it is “accurate” to Japanese culture? Who cares if it is “respectful”? It treats Japanese culture the way Japanese people treat foreign culture – much better, though, as you may have noticed that the ENTIRE cast of the Thermae Romae movie was Japanese – at least Hollywood had the decency here to cast mostly Japanese actors to play Japanese characters in this film. Hell, Keanu Reeves is actually Asian-American, and let’s not bullshit about percentages, because that is extremely racist. He is part Asian, end of story. The cast couldn’t be better, frankly.

    Get over yourselves. It looks like an awesome, fantasy take on Japanese culture, and I will be watching the crap out of it when it is out on video (because I’m raising kids and can’t afford to go to the movies here in Japan – did you know Japanese movie theatres are literally the most expensive in the world?)

    tl:dr – this movie treats Japanese culture with all the respect it deserves, presenting it as kick-ass and awesome, and does no more damage to history than any Japanese anime possibly could.

  • momiji

    That was pretty awesome. Keenu Reeves is at least part Asian but it’s still pretty apt. It reminds me of James Clavell novels (Shogun, Tai Pan, etc…) , the hero is always a white guy who winds up in Asia, learn whatever language and martial arts, rescue the hot Asian heroine from the patriarchal Asian guy antagonists, and then basically outdo them at some aspect of their culture. All with a lot of irritating vocabulary dropping. Everyone is speaking Japanese and he randomly inserts Japanese words as though they don’t have English equivalents. Here’s a pretty good take on it: http://jsbangs.com/2011/12/27/honkies-revisited/

  • Colin reviews

    Finally someone actually speaks the truth; no shock you got downvoted on it. The truth is that every culture rips on others and cares very little about any sort of accuracy or respect in general, Japan being just as bad as (if not worse) than any other.

    That being said, yet again white america comes to rescue the Japan. Problem is this has already been done in an actually semi-entertaining fashion with the Last Samurai (listen to Paul Mooney talk about this; it’s classic). If you’re going to rape a culture’s history at least entertain us; you might actually make a profit on your film that way.

    Speaking of profit: where the hell did the 175 million go for this flick?? For God’s sake, the JDrama Ando Lloyd has better effects than this pile of trash.

    On the plus side this will dissuade retards like Carl Rinsch from making this kind of crap.

    Poor Shibasaki Kou though; how’d a nice dame like her end up in a a mess like this?

  • Reverie

    Great review! I feel like you showed why people who love the story of the 47 Ronin might get disappointed by the movie, w/o ruining the movie. However, I don’t think they got the tengu wrong: The guy on the left in the photo above looks a like a really great karasu-tengu (aka crow-tengu) which have been around for quite a while. You can see life-sized statues if you visit the path at Kenchoji in Kamakura.

  • Wade

    So, where can I get a good take on 47 Ronin? Movies? Books?

  • Yuume

    I was hoping there would be some inclusion of or explanation of 忠臣蔵. Maybe another article opportunity?

  • Yuume

    And just to clarify: I know that it was mentioned in the other article written about this movie, but I feel like with as many different variations as there are, it would be cool to see a full article e.e

  • Samale Matina

    I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. The landscapes, the scenery and the costumes were amazing. Got drawn in to the world. I also enjoyed the story, the characters and the action. All in all a very enjoyable and entertaining movie. People are spending way to much time on deconstructing the movie, on Keanu character etc. at least it gets the a Japanese themed movie into the limelight and in the media. sure it would have been nice to have only Japanese cast but see how far that would have gone. Just enjoy the show for what it is. loved it.

  • Arya81

    Quite frankly, it’s not that good a movie. It’s also very obvious,(since I watched it on apple t.v, straight after watching the trailer) that they’ve cut scenes and entire characters, as well as editing many of the scenes. I think some of the scenes and characters they’ve cut may have made this adaptation much more enjoyable.