Dr. Seuss’s Racist Anti-Japanese Propaganda (And His Apology)

It’s always strange to see the more human, adult side of people who were important to us as kids. I was weirded out when it was revealed last year that Charles Schultz used Charlie Brown to hook up with his mistress.

So when I found out that Dr. Seuss made anti-Japanese propaganda, I was a pretty shocked. How could the author of Cat in the Hat and One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish have created such ugly caricatures?

As we saw in How To Spot a Jap, WWII was a time for American artists to use their talents to make racist propaganda for the war effort.

And given the size of WWII, everybody who could contribute something did, including Theodor Seuss Geisel AKA Dr. Seuss.

While Dr. Seuss created propaganda against every enemy of the US (including a lot of quality Hitler caricatures), his propaganda against the Japanese really stands out.

Unlike his propaganda against Nazi Germany, Dr. Seuss’s anti-Japanese propaganda had a racist element behind it. All of the nasty racist stereotypes you’ve ever seen- buck teeth, slanty eyes, replacing Rs with Ls – Dr. Seuss included in his drawings.

You can also see Dr. Seuss’s distinct artstyle. Check out some of the propaganda for yourself:

japanese-proverb

liberators-of-america

righteous-protest

save-your-country-from-them

signal-from-home

sneer-face

Dr. Seuss dutifully cranked out drawing after drawing for his country, trying to turn his fellow citizens against the enemy. But eventually the war ended, and things changed.

Seuss Apologizes

After the war, Dr. Seuss began to question his beliefs about the Japanese. He’d created anti-Japanese propaganda for the US and had supported Japanese internment, but was it all justified?

Not one Japanese-American had been convicted for any sort of sabotage or treason, and the evil monsters that Dr. Seuss had drawn in his wartime propaganda turned out to be much different that he’d imagined.

So how did Dr. Seuss apologize to the Japanese? By writing a children’s book, of course.

horton-hears-a-who

Dr. Seuss wrote Horton Hears a Who!, in part, as an apology to the Japanese that he’d demonized during the war with his propaganda.

Published in 1954, Horton Hears a Who! was dedicated to a Japanese friend of Dr. Seuss, and the story itself is meant to be a metaphor for American postwar occupation of Japan.

While I don’t think that people will ever forget Dr. Seuss’s propaganda, I think that it’s fitting that his apology is much better remembered. It’s a great children’s book that really stands the test of time, and has a heartfelt core message.

Although if Dr. Seuss had known that Horton Hears a Who! was going to be turned into that awful movie, I’m sure he would have found another way to apologize.

  • grimpoteuthis

    I was shocked when I learned about this (and Disney’s WWII propaganda) when I was working in a book store, but I never knew about the apology by way of Horton, I’ll have to give that one another read!

  • DAVIDPD

    Nationalism is a powerful thing.

  • http://twitter.com/intheinaka Matthew Loten

    The imagery utilised by the ‘apology’ is very interesting as well. The huge, benevolent Horton guiding and rescuing the tiny (let’s not forget that line ‘A person’s a person, no matter how small’) Whos.

  • grimpoteuthis

    Also, this isn’t propaganda related but it reminds me of stumbling onto a copy of Roald Dahl’s “Switch Bitch” when until then I had no idea he wrote anything but (my favorite) children’s stories. Love his adult stuff too now, but at first I prob just stared at it with my mouth open for a minute hehe.

  • http://twitter.com/WESTPAC_NAVY John Andresen

    Applying a a 21st Century sense of ‘righteousness’ to events which occured in the midst of a war of aggression perpetuated by the Japanese Empire 70 years ago seems inappropriate. In the context of the barbaric and egregious acts committed by the Japanese government and military, Dr. Seuss’s acts seem trivial. This sort of propaganda was ubiquitous.

  • grimpoteuthis

    So, by extension were the Japanese-American internment camps trivial? That may seem an
    unfair comparison but I think the point is that Seuss himself later came
    to realize that even in a time of war it’s wrong to demonize entire
    races of people.

  • http://twitter.com/MomijiSoule Leslie Soule

    I’m pretty sure wrong is still wrong no matter the scale. Dr. Seuss is admirable because when he realized what he did hurt people, he took responsibility for it and apologized (in a quite memorable way). Let’s not forget that propaganda like this reduced the men of the most decorated military unit in U.S. history, the 442nd regiment in WWII, to a caricature of a balding, buck-toothed, squinty-eyed dude. Now that’s just plain disrespectful to your countrymen – I don’t care what era you’re from.

  • orangedude

    During wartime it’s easy to forget that the people you’re fighting are human beings. It’s easier to write them off as something less than human, or as barbaric. We look back with shame on the memories of when we did such things, yet we are still doing this today.

  • http://twitter.com/shollum Shollum

    I think the fact that the Whos are tiny works better as imagery for the Japanese being a minority in the US. The quote works well with that thought too.

    Of course, he could have just been joking about the Japanese being short too.

  • http://twitter.com/shollum Shollum

    We’ve been doing it since the dawn of civilization (or maybe even earlier). That’s just how humans are; it’s difficult to kill another person, but to kill an animal… well, you do that all the time, so what’s the problem?

    It’s a defense mechanism that the brain uses. It’s really difficult for an average human to kill something they see as a person. During conflict, the brain separates the combatants into two groups; you and them. ‘Them’ are inferior. They are evil. They are less than human. You don’t feel any empathy for them.
    Apply that to a war between nations and it’s no wonder such propaganda shows up.

    And by the way, Them can be decided based off of anything, not just race. Religion is the number one choice when creating a concept of Them. Next is nationality and then race. After that, it can be anything really. Mental state, disease, etc. can all be used to create Them.

  • ABC123

    Imagine if you were an artist, and the government comes to you with a commission for war propaganda (hey, you’re famous and you’ve influence in schools), and then you refuse. Good luck with that. God only knows what’s going to happen to you. Lose your job and fame? Might even lose your life.

  • CorrBlimey

    It would be interesting if we could see what the Japanese drew us as in WWII. I’d love to see an article about that!

  • Drew Parlow

    In his defense, he probably never
    *Puts on sunglasses*
    spotted a Jap.
    YEEEAH.
    Luckily, I never cared for his works too much (I was reading Harry Potter by the time I was 5 1/2 or 6, leaving little time to remember Dr. Suess) to be too disturbed. Not to mention the times were racist AND war was usually fueled with whatever they’ve got. I mean, some people are doing propaganda against terrorism by fueling anti-Muslim feelings; which of course is forgetting that the majority of US domestic terrorism incidents are caused by Right-Wing extremists and Eco-terrorists (together making up about 85% of said domestic terrorism).
    OK, end rant-ish thing. BYE BYE.

  • SJacks

    The art community was still struggling out of the Great Depression (imagine trying to sell something to hang on a wall when a huge portion of the country didn’t have walls anyway). I’m sure it didn’t take much to get an artist to scribble a political cartoon. And if you refused, there were tons of others willing to take your place.

  • Moormanoid

    Interesting story. Thanks!

  • http://www.facebook.com/MULLY5150 Jim Mullins

    It amazes me how simple and narrow minded people can be….and I’m talking about the people that are shocked about this. In 2013 something like this is reprehensible, i agree 110% on that. But when he did that it was a different time, a different place, a different world. Today you would be left with your jaw agape if you heard a white man call a black man a nigger. Back in 1850 that’s how the USA was. Was it ignorant? From what we know now, yes. But I bet that each and everyone white person that reads and/or comments on this would have been right in there if they were living at that time. Yes, stuff like this is a black mark on our history, but it’s nothing to be shocked about today. Again, the world was a different place at that time. And, for what it’s worth, I’m a US citizen that has lived in Japan for 22 years and has a Japanese wife. I shake my head at things like this but I can’t condemn Dr. Seuss for doing something that was the norm in his day and age.

  • Michael Moore

    I think grimpoteuthis’ diagnoses was correct. Its one thing to encourage your country, and even to make distasteful propaganda against violent acts and enemies, during a time of war. Its another thing to include your own citizens and allies in that propaganda, encouraging unconstitutional acts against them just because they share a similar heritage to the nation at war. Demonizing a race because of international politics and war is ignorance in action. I’m glad Dr. Seuss recognized that, and corrected himself in this.

  • Jim

    Wow! I’m especially shocked by the “waiting for the signal from home” illustration. These also remind me of a Bugs Bunny cartoon I saw as a child in which Bugs played up the “Jap” stereotype. War is hell!

  • fsdhjhgfdgefr

    well i think the movie is fine

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=624507772 Steve Gans

    I’d be interested to see anti-American propaganda that circulated in Japan at the same time.

  • Charlie Smith

    Mat Dr. Seuss burn in Hell with the rest of the racists.

  • face

    hi

  • -Rin

    Are you talking about the movie which included that stereotypical anime reference? XD

  • -Rin
  • Kadeem Tyrell

    Wow everyone here trying to justify his actions because the image of him you once had is now in conflict with BLATANT evidence of his racism. Cognitive Dissonance, look it up. This wasn’t an accident, and there are other ways to make a living. Though selling your soul is probably the quickest. I already knew of his racism before this article because I do so much research on history, mainly the World Wars. I can’t believe the comments I’m reading on here of people trying to rationalize racism because it’s coming from someone who you didn’t even know personally, but feel so emotionally attached to his works. This is the same crap that goes on today. This is why people here a bomb goes off in America and immediately think it’s a Muslim terrorist. Propaganda has made you fear all middle eastern people, yet you don’t even realize it. Regardless of whether or not they are American citizens, we are all human beings. I don’t know why what Dr. Seuss did is more or less atrocious because they were or weren’t Americans. Americans have this heir of superiority that is undue to them. Look at the death toll in Afghanistan, and Iraq, and I’m not talking about the thugs we sent over there to kill I’m talking about citizens of invaded countries. Millions of lives in exchange for the thousands lost during 9/11. No “weapons of mass destruction” not even Osama Bin Laden, because he was in Pakistan. Some of you people need to wake up before it’s too late.

More in History, People (21 of 170 articles)
oddthings1


As we film this month in Japan, I'm starting to remember the things that I've missed most while being here. ...