Did Rice Change How Japanese People Think?

I’ve always been fascinated by the social sciences. Some people say that they’re not as important or “real” as the “hard sciences“ (i.e. chemistry, physics, biology, etc.), but social sciences like sociology and anthropology can show us a lot about how humanity operates.

The social science perspective is especially interesting when applied to Japan. Japanese culture can sometimes be confusing or even weird to outsiders, but once you start to take a look at it from a broader view, things get a lot more interesting and can make more sense.

For instance, I keep seeing one theme pop up time and time again in the social sciences. Social scientists think that one small thing in Japanese life has made big differences: rice.

The Power of Rice

Believe it or not, a lot of people think that a lot of the differences between Asians and the rest of the world has to do with agriculture; more specifically, the process of growing and harvesting rice.

When it comes to agriculture, rice farming is a bit of a unique process. A lot of farming throughout the world involves planting something, then just kind of waiting to harvest it.

Sure, you might need to shoo away pests or pull weeds, but for the most part once it’s planted in the ground, it largely takes care of itself.

Rice farming, on the other hand, is a giant pain in the ass. It’s a really intensive process that requires constant attention from a group of people.

You have to terrace the land, lay down a hard clay base, make sure it’s all level, get the water right, stay on top of weeds, and a lot of other small tasks that, when taken together, can either make or break a rice harvest.

Author Malcolm Gladwell claimed in his book Outliers that

Working in a rice field is ten to twenty times more labor-intensive than working on an equivalent-size corn or wheat field. Some estimates put the annual workload of a wet-rice farmer in Asia at three thousands hours a year.

That by itself is kind of interesting, but what does that have to do with how Japanese people think?

All Together Now

Psychologists, sociologist, and anthropologists have long said that Japanese people are very collective and group-focused, but it’s not always been clear why.

Over time though, people have developed a hypothesis that all of this attention on the group is because of how important (and intensive) rice farming was in Japan’s past.

The idea is that since rice farming is so labor intensive, can’t be done alone, and depends on a group of people working tightly together. That kind of rice farming mentality transferred over into the modern world.

Together, or Separate?

The idea that rice farming made the Japanese a collectivist people is just that – an idea. It’s not really an idea that can be thoroughly tested and there are in fact some people argue the opposite, too.

One of my favorite blogs on social science related to Japan, burogu.com, ran an article recently about just that. In the article, the author argues that rice paddies were actually self-contained ventures; that while it took a family to successfully run a rice paddy, it didn’t take the cooperation of a lot of other people.

Western farmers, on the other hand, often had to collaborate with other specialists to keep their whole farm running. Specialists like butchers, blacksmiths, plowmen, etc., mean that a typical western farmer worked with lots of other people to get the job done.

What’s Ahead?

No matter which idea you subscribe to, it might not matter a whole lot in the present day. In recent years, technology has really changed how rice farming works.

There are far fewer rice farmers in Japan than ever before, and the work is much, much different. Technology means that farming rice is significantly less of a pain in the ass than it was in Japan, and that it takes less strength, time, and people to do it.

Obviously, this means that rice farming (and its effect on the Japanese mentality) is much smaller than ever before. So what’s next?

People have talked about how the salaryman lifestyle is shaping people’s lives in Japan (I actually wrote my senior thesis on the salaryman), but that’s changing too. The salaryman ideal has been on the decline for more than 20 years, and work is rapidly changing in Japan

So what’s next? What’s the next major form of work that will help to shape the Japanese psyche? It’s impossible to predict the future, but it will be interesting, as always, to see how Japanese culture changes.


Header photo by icoro

  • Guest

    Well, since the developed world moves more and more toward service industries, I’d have to say that! But since Japan is fairly unique in its extensive Red Light Districts, I’m going to specify… “service” industries as the next big cultural shaper.

  • kuyaChristian

    Very interesting. My parents grew up helping out at their own family farms in the Philippines and it says a lot on how they raised us. Since we are a big family, they emphasized on helping together out on chores and responsibilites to get stuff done quicker. 
    And speaking of pain in the ass, my dad always tells me how hard it is to grow those rice so I grew up not wasting a single grain to respect the farmers’ hard work.

  • 古戸ヱリカ

    I’m not sure if a hooker based economy is sustainable.

  • http://twitter.com/shollum Shollum

    If the introduction of heavily machine driven rice farming affected eastern farmers how heavily machine driven farming affected western farmers, then I guess a lot of ex-farmers turned to sumo.

    Farming of any kind was hard work, so families ate a lot of food to keep their energy up during the long hours of work. When farming became large scale and greatly automated, the people who quit farming still ate like farmers. You see where I’m going with this right?

  • Sukibeam

    I always thought Confucian thought was the major shaper of the Asian countries, collective mindset included :)

  • http://www.tofugu.com/ Hashi

    That’s another big one too!

  • Mescale

    Whilst I think it would be nice to have one thing to say hey, this is why are , life is not like that.

    Japan is a small country, you can’t not be friends when you live so close to each other, getting on is quite important.

    The caste system tended to push people together into groups.

    Much of the martial eras you would be part of a lords land, his people, and as such again you are part of a group.

    Doesn’t Ancient Japanese history also say that the natives of Japan some thousand years ago in the jomon era get displaced by migrants in the yayoi era. whoever or where ever these migrants came from maybe they were fleeing from something, this would create strong bonds within the group…

  • guyhey

    I just assume that in a few years Japan will rename itself to neo-akiba 48, and its primary export will be maid cafes, and idols.

  • 古戸ヱリカ

    Yes, crop circles are the results of hungry ex-farmers who had no money, but knew of farms where they could get food.

  • ジョサイア

    @古戸ヱリカ
    What anime is the character in your profile picture from?
    She looks really familiar.

    P.S. Sorry, It’s been bugging me for awhile.  C:

  • 古戸ヱリカ

    Umineko no Naku Koro ni Chiru. Only in the visual novel, though, since the anime never got past the first half of the story.

  • http://twitter.com/shollum Shollum

     It works with exports, but everyone complains about that since they say it ‘treat humans like a product’ and they call it ‘human trafficking’.
    I mean really! Who are they to get in the way of business? I mean, just ’cause they sell people after controlling them with addictive substances they’re gettin’ all up their case!

    (to all of you serious people who can’t understand a joke; this was meant as a joke)

  • http://twitter.com/shollum Shollum

     Best explanation yet, to be honest with you. I mean, besides the thing with people using boards on rope to smash the stuff down. But really, who’s active enough to do that anymore?

  • ジョサイア

    あーわかりました。
    ありがとう。 xD

  • C.M

    Well this is a coincidence lol. I just finished reading Outliers and Malcolm talked about how agriculture effects culture and upbringing. He also calls on Geert Hofstede’s findings.
    Funny enough Geert doesn’t find Japan to be as collectivistic as other Asian nations

  • Edward Ramirez

    ……..i’ve always wondered, what kind of rice do they grow/use/eat in japan?  cant be the goya rice that they use to make rice balls…? lol.  Anyone know?

  • nagz

    gaijinness will be more widely accepted so go figure :)

  • http://twitter.com/shollum Shollum

     It’s not really any different than medieval Europe. I think that’s why you can hypothesize that rice farming was a factor in it.

    Oh, and thank you for closing your tags. Closing tags is very important. So important, in fact, that you might not have gotten your message across without those closing tags.

  • 古戸ヱリカ

    Boards and rope? Do we even have that kind of thing? Sounds like alien tech to me.

  • Bailey Bird

    Hmm, it sounds like the effect of rice farming on Japan’s collective mentality is arguable for the reasons outlined in the article, though my initial thought was instead that perhaps the lasting effect on Japanese culture would be the fact that Japan has such a hard working and determined mentality, which is reflected in the way rice growing would be such an arduous process. 

  • http://twitter.com/Cybeil Seema Kakade

    I’m not so sure about that.. I’m Indian and we eat a lot of rice too.. It’s actually our staple food… but our mindset/thoughts/psychology is totally different from the japanese.. 

  • http://mistersanity.blogspot.com Jonadab

    I don’t buy it.  Ancient near-eastern cultures couldn’t grow rice (because there’s just plain not enough water in that part of the world — they were lucky if they could grow wheat, and many of them are based on nomadic pastoral subsistence), and yet they have a MUCH stronger sense of group responsibility and collectivity than is normal in the West.  

    Just for example, the Hebrew Bible speaks on numerous occasions of entire nations being punished for the act of one person (sometimes the offender was a leader, e.g., when King David counted the fighting men; and sometimes he’s just a regular guy, e.g., Achan).  The reverse situation also occurs, where a person who did not participate in and even opposed the offensive actions is still held responsible for them as a part of the group, because “_we_ have sinned”.  People are held responsible for the actions of not only their children but also their parents, grandparents, and even more distant ancestors.  (Indeed, the blood feud between Israel and the Arab peoples started some three thousand years ago and shows no signs of ever letting up.)

    Western society has largely rejected these ideas in favor of individuality and *personal* responsibility, but collectivism and group ethics did not develop uniquely in southeast Asia due to rice farming.  It’s much older and was probably how all of humanity thought at some point in the past.

  • http://www.tofugu.com/ Hashi

    A Vietnamese friend of mine says that leaving even one grain of rice behind is a sin. Guess I know where it comes from now :p

  • http://www.tofugu.com/ Hashi

    Good point, the people who did this kind of research seem to have forgotten about India entirely!

  • guyhey

    India is just south of Michigan right?

  • http://www.vietamins.com Viet

    Is India where the Indy 500 is held?

  • http://twitter.com/SactoMan81 Raymond Chuang

    Actually, the rice nowadays grown in Japan are done less and less on terraced hills and more and more on flat land, where it’s easier to employ mechanization to reduce the need for human labor. That’s why rice farming in Japan is looking more and more like a reduced-size version of the highly-mechanized rice farming you see north of Sacramento, CA and in Arkansas, the lowlands of Louisiana and eastern Texas. I’ve seen videos the of the flatland around Izumo in Shimane Prefecture and in the eastern flatlands of Chiba Prefecture and there are rice paddies on a very large scale.